Jump to content

Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers/Archive 2022

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Requests answered in December 2022
Requests answered in November 2022
Requests answered in October 2022
  checkY Merger complete. GenQuest "scribble" 16:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
  checkY Merger complete. 15:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Requests answered in September 2022
  • Merge:
2016 Democratic National Committee email leak, and
Podesta emails
into Draft:2016 Election leaks. REASON: They share background, perpetrators, investigations, reactions and are a series of events part of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections and overlap in timing. Discussion is here and has WP:WEAKSILENCE after a month. :Softlemonades (talk) 13:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Requests answered in August 2022
Requests answered in July 2022
 Not done Stale discussion stalled with no clear consensus to merge. GenQuest "scribble" 16:05, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Merge Merging please:
- Ibrahim Ahmad (footballer) into Ibrahim Khalfan
- Mansoor Bakheet into Mansour Muftah
- Salah Eid into Saleh Al-Mehaizaa

There are the same players. --Fayçal.09 (talk) 11:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

  • Merge
- E. Balasubramaniyan to E. Balasubramanian
- A M V Prabhakara Raja to A. M. V. Prabhakara Raja

Reason: both are same

  • Merge Roman Festival Liberalia into Liberalia. They are the same topic. The first is by far the longest but also the most recently created (on 3 December 2020 by User:Kswizzy42, a student editor at Western Washington University). The second is quite short but much older (2005) so I presume more articles directly link to it. It doesn't look like the student editor's contributions were thoroughly checked by their supervisor. I attempted a merge notice on each article, but I found the whole process very confusing. I'm willing to rewrite both articles as one, as the topic is well within my usual purview. Sorry to add one more request to an already long list Haploidavey (talk) 06:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Requests answered in June 2022
  • Merge Android 17 and Android 18 into Android 17 and 18. The two fictional characters' pages contain alot of the same content and sources, both characters are connnected to eachother in terms of notability and seperate articles seem redundant. If merged, article length should be roughly the legth of 18's, since a majority of the bloat exists in the "Creation" and "Appearances" sections which restate things that apply to both characters. Discussion can be found here: Talk:Android 18#Second merger proposal
Requests answered in May 2022
  • I agree with Generalrelative that the discussion on the talk page does not provide what we mean by consensus for the purposes of a merge. If you want the move to happen, please explicitly propose a move on one of the talk pages, mention it on the other and give a clear rationale for the move, which can refer to arguments made by others. As it stands this proposed merge should be refused. — Charles Stewart (talk) 10:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
  • @TiggyTheTerrible: Please give a rationale for the move here. Then other editors can assist in tagging the pages and formally opening the discussion. Felix QW (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
@Felix QW: Reverse sexism is just sexism according to the dictionary and to the definition of reverse sexism (i.e. sexism, against males). The sexism page should be open to sexism against males being given equal footing, otherwise I would have to question what's going on there. Lack of parity gives - at least - the impression of sexism. Tiggy The Terrible (talk) 20:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Requests answered in April 2022
  • Merge Autism and autism spectrum. These pages are a mess as they stand. The former has been used both as a synonym for the latter, and historically as a more specific term for what is sometimes called 'Kanner autism' (which is no longer treated as a separate category by the relevant diagnostic manuals, which consistently used 'Autism Spectrum Disorder'). This article is a mishmash of things assuming the former sense, and things assuming the latter; it is not easy to see which is intended for any given claim. The former would be better covered in a historical account of this obsolete diagnostic category; the latter belongs in an article about the broader concept. Autism spectrum needs considerable work to bring it up to date, but it would make sense for this overhaul to be combined with the work of merging. --Oolong (talk) 08:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Requests answered in March 2022
Requests answered in February 2022
Requests answered in January 2022