Jump to content

User talk:RWILDONLINE

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Someone again reverted your edits[edit]

Hi @RWILDONLINE, some has again reverted your edits that you have made for salaam. Can you look into it. Thanks. Uzumaki787 (talk) 13:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Uzumaki787! I have corrected their edits. The page in question is no longer protected, allowing anyone, including you, to edit it. Given your interest in Wikipedia, I recommend that you gain experience by editing articles and participating in tasks at the Wikipedia: Task Center. Thank you. RWILD 16:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi RWILDONLINE. Thank you for your work on Kolikapudi Srinivasa Rao. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating article on Indian politicians and expanding the coverge of Politics on Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

--- Infínítybσy7(@píng mє-tαlk mє) 11:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nellore district, Kadapa district and Konaseema district have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.
Please keep to the article title as per WP:COMMONNAME not the WP:OFFICIALNAME- Arjayay (talk) 14:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article Kalki 2898 AD did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Sacnilk source or any news media using Sacnilk source and the claims made by the film's own production company are unreliable. Source needs to be secondary independent. RangersRus (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]