User talk:RTode

Hello RTode and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have not already created a account here, note that you do not have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Getting started
Wikipedia Tutorial • How to edit a page • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Manual of Style • Be bold in editing • How to write a great article

Getting your info out there
Cite your sources • Neutral Point of View • Point of View • Verifiability • Policy Library

Getting help
New contributors' help page • Where to ask a question • Help Desk • Frequently Asked Questions

Getting along
Wikiquette • Civility • Sign your posts • Wikipedians • Conflict resolution •

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes(~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Bduke (Discussion) 08:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

International Academy of Mathematical Chemistry[edit]

Your recent edits to this article are a copyright violation as they are a direct copy of the Academy website. I can see no indication that the Academy website material is released into the public domain or under an open license that is acceptable to wikipedia. I have therefore reverted your edits. You need to write something in your own words and much briefer. The list of officers would be easily acceptable if laid out differently. --Bduke (Discussion) 08:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on my talk as is fairly normal to keep the discussion in one place. Please discuss the issue there. --Bduke (Discussion) 11:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]