User:DangerousPanda/toolbox
[my tools]
Dashboard[edit]
CAVEAT: all the |show=
parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs[edit]
Administrative backlog[edit]
WP:AIV[edit]
AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports[edit]
Bot-reported[edit]
- 2001:e60:3123:4875::3320:e0b0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- 41.113.185.137 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Junaid akhtar bin jamil akhtar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. PhilKnight (talk) 17:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2401:ba80:a10f:e7ae:ca8:c3ff:fefa:5dc8 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Attempting to add the phone numbers of a train station. Stopped by the filter. Not blockable. PhilKnight (talk) 17:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported[edit]
- Hmm173627 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content + obvious block-evading sock of Ud817.[1][2][3][4] Skitash (talk) 15:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. Bbb23 (talk) 16:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2405:201:a400::/38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) Persistent Disruptive editing. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 16:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined. Too much collateral damage, blocked the /64 instead. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 16:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2603:800C:2300:6139:CE7:D845:1540:86AF (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Duane Chapman (diff): Vandal only, not here. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Just the one edit. Not enough for a block. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Jarrod Quigley (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Randomly reverting edits that some are in good faith. LTA. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 16:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem, thanks for warning! Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 17:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs[edit]
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
---|---|
User requested | 1 |
Empty articles | 0 |
Nonsense pages | 0 |
Spam pages | 1 |
Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
Other candidates | 18 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
---|
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 17 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 8 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP[edit]
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Neilia Hunter Biden[edit]
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – All IP edits in the past six months were reverted. Given the subject is very close to the candidate of the US presidential election, I suggest implementing pending changes protection until after the 2024 presidential election (Nov 5) is over. Broc (talk) 06:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/AP IanDBeacon (talk) 17:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Valkyrie Anatomia[edit]
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Tiyyar[edit]
Reason: Request for Extended Page Protection. Page is vandalized multiple times by anonymous IPs who delete sourced entries. The current status of community is mentioned in first paragraph but IP moved it to history section, which does not suit current status of community. Piyush Chekavar (talk) 09:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Muuse Ismaciil Qalinle[edit]
Reason: Repeated (mostly IP) editor removal of AfD tag within less than 48 hours. (See diffs here: [5] [6], [7], [8], [9].) Temporary protection requested until conclusion of AfD discussion. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 11:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Deadpool & Wolverine[edit]
Semi-protection: Many reverted edits after the end of the last protection (only 2 days ago), with unsourced, unnecessary and wrong edits--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 11:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Kalki 2898 AD[edit]
Reason: The talk page bombed by repeat Extended-confirmed-protected edit request and comments to change the boxoffice numbers by many IPs. After answering the requests, the comments and request continue to repeat. Can the talk page be protected for confirmed users only for some period of time? RangersRus (talk) 12:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Jamie Maclaren[edit]
Reason: High level of IP vandalism from India. He has been linked with joining an Indian club but nothing is confirmed or near completion but this page is continuously vandalised applying he has joined the club and has a squad number. The vandalism is also done with very poor grammar/english. Nzs9 (talk) 12:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Ghulja incident[edit]
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:GS/UYGHUR, enforcement. -Lemonaka 12:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Prima Donnas[edit]
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 14:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Julian Assange[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 14:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Steven Stamkos[edit]
Reason: high levels of IP edits after free agency rumors. 45BearsFan (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
2010 Atlantic hurricane season[edit]
Reason: The extended confirmed protection is no longer necessary because the autoconfirmed vandalism-only account that vandalized the page in October 2022 probably won't come back to this article. I would suggest reducing it to semi-protection or unprotecting the page entirely. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops, I did not discuss with the protecting admin first. I did not see that note until after submitting this. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
14 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA[edit]
RFA= Requests for adminship
WP:RFP[edit]
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled[edit]
User:Xegma[edit]
- Xegma (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
User:C1K98V[edit]
- C1K98V (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
User:Roastedbeanz1[edit]
- Roastedbeanz1 (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have written a total of 48 articles, including 6 in the past 2 days, mainly about hip hop artists. My articles usually have little to no issue. I'm requesting for the autopatrolled right to lighten the amount of unreviewed articles. Roasted; (talk), c. 00:07, 19 June 2023 (CDT)
Not done, sorry. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wacotron looks like it's heading for deletion and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overtaxation of the United States was not that long ago. – Joe (talk) 09:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
User:Horse Eye's Back[edit]
- Horse Eye's Back (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Because NPP is the first line of systemic bias on wiki, exempting even just my creations from NPP is an improvement. In my own experience NPP has been a net negative, while I'm sure it is useful in some cases at some point my article creations aren't those. My creation history is beyond reproach, I have even been solicitied to join NPP on multiple occasions but have repeatedly declined on ideological grounds (I don't join paramilitary organization like the NPP). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Done Rlendog (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Rlendog: This is your first edit to this page since 2009 and the first time you have ever granted a perm to another user, and it is to accept, without discussion or explanation, six minutes after it was made, a request for an exemption to NPP that calls it a "net negative" and "paramilitary organization". That's rather odd. Would you mind explaining what brought you here and your thought process in handling this request a bit further? – Joe (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I wholly share Joe's concerns here, even putting aside the extraordinary speed this was seemingly actioned, but to not challenge someone who clearly has some significant underlying issues with the page patrolling process seems to be an oversight. The appellant's expressed opinions on the process and their desire to bypass it entirely, with that rationale, warrants scrutiny. Bungle (talk • contribs) 13:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- I reviewed several of his new articles and did not see any issues. Rlendog (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've also been familiar with this editor's editing for a while, and while I think there have been issues with some of his edits to noticeboards, I have not seen any issues with his new pages. Rlendog (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't see an issue with the NPP is a paramilitary organization comment then? – Joe (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have problems with the way this editor sometimes interacts with other editors, including overzealous language. But those problems are not with his editing of articles, creation of new articles, or with his knowledge of our guidelines and policies. If anything, they are overzealous in discussing those guidelines and policies, which is my impression of his depiction of NPP.
- My experience with this editor goes back to January/February 2023, in a discussion at ANI regarding AfDs of certain football players. I thought some of their comments were inappropriate, particularly disparaging one particular editor involved in the discussion. He also made at least one uncomplimentary comment about me. Given that I was involved, and that the long discussion at ANI was plenty visible to many admins, I did not take any action regarding the HEB's disparaging comments at the time. But I did review their edits to ensure that they were not just trolling, and found that their edits to articles were fine and that they can be helpful to other editors who ask for assistance on their talk page. And since I was concerned that their aggressive comments about other editors may be a pattern, I saved some of the diffs from that ANI discussion in case issues arose later.
- I've had a few other interactions with them since. In a discussion in late 2023 there were more interactions between HEB and the editor they disparaged in early 2023, in which HEB made at least one more condescending comment about the other editor. There was also an ANI around the same time about HEB's behavior in which that other editor linked the page containing my diffs from the previous ANI. I don't think I participated in the later ANI (if I did my participation was minimal), since the evidence I would have had to offer had already been linked, but I checked HEB's contributions again and did not find anything wrong with his article editing, and again saw their willingness to help others, albeit sometimes caustically, which is another reason I chose to not participate (or minimally participate) in the new ANI. After that ANI ended with no action against HEB, HEB requested that the diff page be speedy deleted. But as an admin, you are able to see it: User:Rlendog/Sandbox6.
- There is one more incident I recall interacting with HEB on, where they made a disparaging remark about an editor who created an article about a sportsperson (I think an ice hockey player) that was at AfD. In that case the article pretty clearly did not meet our current notability guidelines, but had met the notability guidelines that were in place when the article was created. So I commented (not sure if it was on the AfD or on their talk page) that HEB ought to be careful about disparaging editors who created articles that were perfectly legitimate under guidelines then in effect, even if those guidelines subsequently changed.
- But none of my interactions or reviews of their contributions indicated any issues with their editing or creation of articles, or with their knowledge of our current guidelines or policies; in fact, my only concern with their knowledge is their overzealousness in enforcing them. So when this request came up on my Watchlist, I was surprised that they didn't already have Autopatrol rights. I actually came to the page wondering if they were disparaging someone for requesting Autopatrol. When I saw it was they requesting, I checked some of their recent creations to make sure their wasn't a problem, and granted the rights. I am sure that they are aware that if they abuse the right it will be removed. And if you think I was mistaken in granting the right, I have no problem with you removing it. But while I think there are sometimes issues with the way they interact with others, those are not issues with article creation. And while it is possible that their interaction issues may one day get them banned or blocked, as long as they remain editors in good standing, I am comfortable with them being Autopatrolled (but again, you may have more experience granting this right, and if I erred feel free to overturn it). Rlendog (talk) 18:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't see an issue with the NPP is a paramilitary organization comment then? – Joe (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've also been familiar with this editor's editing for a while, and while I think there have been issues with some of his edits to noticeboards, I have not seen any issues with his new pages. Rlendog (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- I reviewed several of his new articles and did not see any issues. Rlendog (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I wholly share Joe's concerns here, even putting aside the extraordinary speed this was seemingly actioned, but to not challenge someone who clearly has some significant underlying issues with the page patrolling process seems to be an oversight. The appellant's expressed opinions on the process and their desire to bypass it entirely, with that rationale, warrants scrutiny. Bungle (talk • contribs) 13:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Rlendog: This is your first edit to this page since 2009 and the first time you have ever granted a perm to another user, and it is to accept, without discussion or explanation, six minutes after it was made, a request for an exemption to NPP that calls it a "net negative" and "paramilitary organization". That's rather odd. Would you mind explaining what brought you here and your thought process in handling this request a bit further? – Joe (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Page mover[edit]
User:PadFoot2008[edit]
- PadFoot2008 (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy and though usually move those articles myself, they sometimes can't be moved due to technical reasons. I have participated in numerous WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008 04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am slightly concerned about the number of recent reverted moves. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Primefac, concerning those two reverted moves, they were indeed mistakes on my part. In hindsight, I should have done a deeper study of the main article Gahadavala dynasty. I had decided to move some Indian monarch articles to be in par with the standard convention of "(name) of (kingdom)" (such as George II of Great Britain), and when I discovered the two articles (Madanapala (Gahadavala dynasty) and Govindachandra (Gahadavala dynasty)), I proceeded to have a quick look at the main article, where I saw the phrase "Gahadavalas of Kannauj", and after performing a quick search through the usages of "Govindachandra of Kannauj" in RS, I arrived at the conclusion that it would be a good move location. After the move was reverted, I dug deeper and read the main article more carefully and found out that the Gahadavalas do not actually appear to have ruled over the city of Kannauj but rather over Varanasi. I have since been more careful in performing such moves, and the five monarch related article moves performed since seem good for now. PadFoot (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
User:SparrowQ[edit]
- SparrowQ (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting page mover rights that "I am requesting page mover rights to efficiently handle page renaming jobs. This will help simplify the maintenance process and improve the content." SparrowQ (talk) 20:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Mass message sender[edit]
User:Path slopu[edit]
- Path slopu (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
It's been a long time! I'm reaching out to request access to MMS permissions again, which were revoked due to inactivity. I'd like to continue working on my previous projects. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 09:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
User:48JCL[edit]
- 48JCL (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
User:HypeBoy[edit]
- HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been helping in improving Wikipedia for three years now, and I am familiar with the wikipedia policy on vandalism (I routinely fight vandalism by patrolling edit filter log) as well as the main points of NPOV, Verifiability, WP:NOR, and WP:NOT. I'm hoping I can contribute more to Wikipedia by having PCR right. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done, I looked through the history of your talk page to see how you interact with other editors and quickly found this edit (pure vandalism, and dismissed with "Get off my talk page."). Plus, lots of other warnings (and a block) for personal attacks; copyvio, edit warring, and more, and you chose to respond insultingly to most of them. Advanced permissions require the ability to distinguish vandalism (and obviously refrain from it yourself) and to engage in good faith with messages from other editors. DanCherek (talk) 17:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
User:Skitash[edit]
- Skitash (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have a very strong understanding of Wikipedia guidelines, and I revert disruptive editors and report them to WP:AIV on a daily basis. I would greatly appreciate access to this permission so that I can review edits to articles. Skitash (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
User:Harpick[edit]
- Harpick (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I help with reverting vandalism, and have also read up on Wikipedia's policies on what content would be generally allowed here. -- Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had an account for 12 days. — MusikBot talk 00:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done User has been CU-blocked. DanCherek (talk) 04:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
User:TCMemoire[edit]
- TCMemoire (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Active in vandalism fighting, already have rollback rights. I would like this tool because I do patrol some high-traffic protected pages, e.g. Mount Rushmore, for WikiProjects I'm involved in. – TCMemoire 15:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Rollback[edit]
User:Queen of Hearts[edit]
- Queen of Hearts (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello; I had rollback until I resigned in March because of lack of need. That said, I have recently ran into situations where this right would be helpful and I would like to get back into the flow of using Huggle and related tools again. Cheers, Queen of Hearts talk 23:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
[edit]
Policies and links
My tools[edit]
- Welcome to a user who has been uncivil to start {{subst:User:Bwilkins/welcomecivil}} ~~~~
- Quick note to someone who neglected to notify the other party {{subst:User:Bwilkins/didnotnotify}} ~~~~
- Quick note about forum shopping {{subst:User:Bwilkins/forumshopping}} ~~~~
- Warning to someone claiming to be an admin when they are not {{subst:User:Bwilkins/notanadmin}} ~~~~
- My list of Barnstar userboxes
- A nice way for people to say "sorry" without admitting fault in civility situations {{subst:User:Bwilkins/wasuncivil|*article that you appreciate*}}
Other people's tools[edit]
- RfA closure from User:EVula
- Who's watching?
- Wikichecker
- Soxred93's tools
- Compare Contribs
- Checkuser-ish-light
- COIBot Report
- Page visits tool
- A person's votes on AfD
- AfD Closure Stats by an editor
No RfXs since 00:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |