Talk:Knanaya Catholics

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Knanaya
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Knanaya

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

India Low‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed Deletion[edit]

I'd like to delete this article for the reason that it is unnecessary and excessive. The main Knanaya wiki page already includes all of this information and has a link to the Kottayam Diocese website. Also this page is at odds with the main page leaving users confused as to what the history of the Knanaya actually is. Thomast48 (talk) 16:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.—Cúchullain ^t/c 17:33, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Oppose, this article has more content regarding the subject, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:00, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article covers nothing that's not better covered at the Knanaya article. It needs to be merged.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can we make this an RFC to settle this? , regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish. Why don't you start by explaining how this article passes the notability, neutrality and sourcing requirements?--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Will respond tomorrow, feel free to go ahead with the RFC Atlantic306 (talk) 19:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Have restored the redirect as this version doesn't add much and is hard to verify, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:00, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]