I, too, wondered what the caps were doing there. Simply linking to the edit that created them doesn't answer the question. Why are they there? Brianboulton (talk) 08:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You have brought this article to FAC. It is your job to respond to questions, not mine to go hunting for answers. Please show some courtesy to reviewers who are prepared to spend time on your articles, and answer the question. Brianboulton (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please show where I nominated this? Also please show how I can possibly speak for someone else? Furthermore, are you even Bibliomaniac? I don't recall him having another name, but I could be wrong. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ottava, Ceoil listed you as a nominator - if you would like to be removed, let us know. Also, I believe both Brianboulton and Bibliomaniac15 were asking about the same issue, so let's just try to answer their question or fix the problem. Thanks. Awadewit (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I linked to where the error came from. There is nothing more that I can do. Obviously, if someone else besides me is randomly inserting in things that people have a problem with, I am not supposed to be the one attacked. Brian's comments were absolutely shameful and inappropriate. Awadewit, you should know better than to encourage it. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:08, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ottava, there is nothing wrong with Brian's comments. You are listed as a nominator. Again, if you do not want this job, please request to be removed. Awadewit (talk) 22:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Awadewit, it was asked why it was there. No one can answer that besides Ceoil. You know that. I know that. We all know that. Unless you can somehow claim that I have magical ability to read minds, please stop now. Your actions are completely inappropriate. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All you had to do, in answer to Bibliomaniac's question, was to reply along the lines: "I don't know at the moment, but I will investigate" or some such comment. Replying by offering a link without any explanation, and then replying to me in the fashion that you did, might be considered as rather more "inappropriate" than my mild rebuke to you. But enough: there is an article here that needs some positive and creative feedback, and this argument is a distraction. The matter is over, as far as I am concerned (but I wish someone would explain those damn' caps!). Brianboulton (talk) 22:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How can I answer for someone else? Obviously, I can't. The only one that can answer is Ceoil. Now stop trolling before I report both you and Awadewit to ANI for disruption. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, that was a typo there. I was called away unexpectadly for a number of days, apologies for slow response. However it was so obviously an error, I can't understand where Ottava is coming from. Ceoil (talk) 19:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your typoes tend to be certain localized spelling. You tend to be very good at grammar and formatting. So, it was best for you to say what it was. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
