Wikipedia:WikiProject Norway/Assessment
Norway pages by quality | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | |||||||
Total | |||||||
![]() |
23 | ||||||
![]() |
20 | ||||||
![]() |
2 | ||||||
![]() |
279 | ||||||
B | 722 | ||||||
C | 1,880 | ||||||
Start | 10,163 | ||||||
Stub | 29,148 | ||||||
List | 1,701 | ||||||
Category | 12,946 | ||||||
Disambig | 153 | ||||||
File | 881 | ||||||
Portal | 15 | ||||||
Project | 22 | ||||||
Redirect | 1,610 | ||||||
Template | 1,098 | ||||||
NA | 13 | ||||||
Assessed | 60,676 | ||||||
Unassessed | 10 | ||||||
Total | 60,686 | ||||||
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 235,949 | Ω = 5.59 |
Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Norway! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Norway related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Norway}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Norway articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions[edit]
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of WikiProject Norway is free to add or change the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions[edit]
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Norway}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Norway|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Norway articles) | ![]() |
|
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Norway articles) | ![]() |
|
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Norway articles) | ![]() |
|
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Norway articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Norway articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Norway articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Norway articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Norway articles) | ![]() |
|
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Norway articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Norway articles) | Category | |
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Norway articles) | Disambig | |
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Norway articles) | Draft | |
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Norway articles) | File | |
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Norway articles) | Portal | |
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Norway articles) | Project | |
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Norway articles) | Redirect | |
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Norway articles) | Template | |
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Norway articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Norway articles) | ??? |
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scale[edit]
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Battle of Svolder |
![]() |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
![]() |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Norse mythology |
![]() |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Bjørnøya |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Bergen |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Steinerud (station) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Stjernen I (As of July 2007) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of bridges in Norway by length |
Category | Any category falls under this class. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | Category:Bridges in Norway |
Disambig | Any disambiguation page falls under this class. | The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. | Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. | Dovre (disambiguation) |
Template | Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. | Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. | Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. | Template:Flytoget |
NA | Any non-article page that fits no other classification. | The page contains no article content. | Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. | Portal:Norway |
Requesting an assessment[edit]
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to edit and list it below.
- Skiringssal: I'm sure this is no longer a stub; I'd like to improve it further but have limited access to sources and have not learned to read Norwegian, other than very slowly with the help of online grammars and dictionaries. Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've completely translated and expanded the article for the NTNU University Museum and would love a new rating! AndersLeo (talk) 14:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Assessment log[edit]
Norway articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
June 27, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Dagfinn Aarskog (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- King Curling (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Sinsen Church (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Transjoik (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
June 26, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Alta, Norway renamed to Alta.
- Scandinavian Hunter-Gatherer renamed to Scandinavian hunter-gatherer.
Reassessed[edit]
- Twin Cities Hardingfelelag (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Alta Municipality (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Scandinavian hunter-gatherer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Tommy Hansen (footballer, born 1967) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
June 25, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- 2023 Hamarkameratene season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Odds BK season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Sandefjord Fotball season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Bagatelle (restaurant) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Hammerfest Municipality (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Hasvik Municipality (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Loppa Municipality (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- 2023 KFUM-Kameratene Oslo season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Rosenborg BK season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Stabæk Fotball season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Strømsgodset Toppfotball season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Toppserien (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Tromsø IL season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Viking FK season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Vålerenga Fotball season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Norwegian anti-Zionists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
June 24, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- 2023 FK Bodø/Glimt season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 FK Haugesund season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Lillestrøm SK season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Molde FK season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Norwegian Second Division (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 SK Brann season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Sarpsborg 08 FF season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Kurt Narvesen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Martinius Stenshorne (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Mattis Stenshagen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Nasjonal Samling Kvinneorganisasjon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Sondre Ørjasæter (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
June 23, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- Magni Smedås (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Nasjonal Samling Ungdomsfylking (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Victoria Gulliksen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
June 22, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Langenes, Finnmark renamed to Langnes, Finnmark.
Assessed[edit]
- 2023 Aalesunds FK season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Cod oil gas and condensate field (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Langnes, Finnmark (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
June 21, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Hasvik renamed to Hasvik (disambiguation).
- Loppa renamed to Loppa (disambiguation).
Reassessed[edit]
- Tommy Bertheussen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- 1968 Helvetia Cup (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Hasvik Municipality (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Loppa Municipality (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Salhuskvintetten Olkabilamo (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)