Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Intercontinental Cup (football) matches/archive1

List of Intercontinental Cup (football) matches

List of Intercontinental Cup (football) matches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of Intercontinental Cup (football) matches/archive1

Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Spent some time working on this article about a quirky former football competition to bring it up to featured standard and complete the UEFA club competition winners topic. Thanks in advance for your comments. NapHit (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

• "The Intercontinental Cup was disbanded" - I think "discontinued" would be a more appropriate word
• "In its first eight editions, the competition's winner was decided on a points system" - the table shows nine
• "determine the outcome in case of a tie" => "determine the outcome in the event of a draw"
• "The most successful confederation is CONMEBOL, teams representing the confederation have won the competition 22 times" => "The most successful confederation is CONMEBOL, teams representing the confederation having won the competition 22 times"
• Why are there flags by the two Japanese stadiums but not any other stadium?
• Note o is missing its full stop -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your comments, @ChrisTheDude: I've addressed them all. NapHit (talk) 16:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• In tables where you have rowspans for header cells, there the scope should be "rowgroup".
• I don't understand the sorting within the Score column. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the comments, @MPGuy2824: I should have fixed both of those now. NapHit (talk) 20:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

    Slightly weird to use "two-legged" and "single-leg". Please change it to either "single and double" or "one and two", whichever the sources support more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

    It's common to refer to ties of this nature in football as being played over two-legs, so it would be odd to write double finals or even two match finals. I agree it does sound a bit weird, but changing to something else wouldn't reflect how sources refer to these type of matches. NapHit (talk) 07:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

    I don't object to the word leg/legged being used. So my suggestion is to either use "single/double-leg" OR "one/two-leg", but not a mix of the two. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

    Ok, think I've fixed this now @MPGuy2824:. Should all refer to two-legs. NapHit (talk) 09:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

    Not sure how I missed this ping. The table of contents itself has the following: "Matches over two-legs" and "Single leg matches". If you can change the section title and the caption of the table in that section it would be great. I'm supporting this promotion since these are smallish changes which I'm sure you'll get to. P.S. If interest and time permit, please comment at my FL nom. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

    Thanks for getting back to me @MPGuy2824:, I've made those changes and will take a look at our nom in due course. NapHit (talk) 18:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Sgubaldo

I did a sweep with IABot, I hope you don't mind. I also added a url for the Vonnard source and changed the publisher to palgrave macmillan per the url. Feel free to revert if you disagree.

Only two comments:

• The infobox image is under the |logo= parameter; it would benefit from being changed to the |image= parameter and from having a caption.
• Statements about the playoffs vary slightly:

1. Peñarol won 2–1 in playoff at Estadio Centenario

2. Santos 1–0 in playoff at Estádio do Maracanã

3. Internazionale won playoff 1–0 at Santiago Bernabéu; Racing Club won playoff 1–0 at Estadio Centenario

I would make them all like 1 but add 'the' before playoff. So "Team won x-y in the playoff at Stadium".

Sgubaldo (talk) 00:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• • Thanks for your comments, @Sgubaldo: they should all be addressed now. NapHit (talk) 20:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

    Support. Sgubaldo (talk) 20:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)