User talk:Wafflesandpancakes

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 15:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wafflesandpancakes, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback[edit]

Hi! I wanted to give you a bit of feedback on your draft.

I did some editing for tone, as there are some portions of this that read as a little non-neutral. For example "where his manufacturing operations set industry standards for quality, delivery, cost and service as it became the fastest-growing, most profitable computer company in the world" came across as promotional and non-neutral. While this wasn't intentional, it's something that you have to be very careful about.

Also be careful of sourcing. There are a lot of primary sources in the article and while you can still use primary sources to back up basic information, they should be used sparingly. The reasons for this are ones of notability and verifiability. Notability cannot be established with a primary source regardless of the claims, as we need to be able to show where the claims are notable by way of secondary coverage. There's also the issue of verification, as we can't always guarantee that the claims are legit. For example, they could have either inflated the claims to be more major than they were or they could have been made up entirely. It's unfortunate to say, but it's happened on more than one occasion on here. Avoid sourcing in places like Genealogy.com, as we can't really verify the person who created the source (as anyone can sign up) and it's also primary.

Finally, be careful of what is added. For example, it's generally unnecessary to go into a lot of depth about a person's family unless there's a lot of non-primary coverage about them. For the most part biographies will just list how many children someone has, rather than all of their names and the names of the grandchildren and so on. Part of the reason for this is verification, as most sources won't cover a person's family in depth unless they're hugely major figures or they're covering a family in general (ie, like Bill & Melinda Gates's family or a historical family).

Now that aside, this does appear to be a notable person - the article just needs more independent coverage and a little tweaking, so good job on finding someone who wasn't already on Wikipedia! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Harvey Newquist II[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Harvey Newquist II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harvey Newquist II for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harvey Newquist II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey Newquist II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing on Wikipedia , terms of service[edit]

Hello Wafflesandpancakes. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Eddie Newquist, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wafflesandpancakes. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wafflesandpancakes|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should have warned your properly as a nominator and explain COI editing rules (like Bri did here). When in doubt read this. Also you can ask me questions about paid editing, I have learned this theme the hard way. :) -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 04:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bri I'm sorry, this wasn't intentional, I have updated my page to reflect that I was paid for the Harvey Newquist page. Wafflesandpancakes (talk) 13:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid edits[edit]

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Eddie Newquist for their contributions to Wikipedia.