User talk:Taco The Dank

Umm... I don't really know what to put here sooo... uh... hi. I guess I'll fill this in later when I get to it.

November 2017[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 04:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih (talk) 05:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Taco The Dank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(I hope I'm doing this right, and/or putting this in the right place, because the directions for where to appeal were kinda confusing)

Hey... Umm... I'm sorry about what happened earlier with my user talk page and the other page. I have a habit of being very in-good-fun, carefree, and loose with the things I do and say on other websites (like Discord, Snapchat, and pretty much any other social media). For a reason that is actually kinda unbeknownst to me, I thought I could be the same way here with my tendencies. Even though it may seem otherwise, I really had no ill-intention towards Wikipedia or any of its pages. In my mind, at the time of making my user page, all I was doing was just describing myself in the most honest way I saw fit (which I do on other websites/social media), which I saw later (after getting blocked) as a stupid mistake, particularly as it wasn't formal at all like it should've been on a professional website. Although I always knew Wikipedia was a professional site and should be treated like one, that wasn't in mind like it should've at that moment. I really am sorry about that and I sincerely apologize. I am asking you out of favor (is that the right term? idk I'm not very good with explaining my thoughts) to please consider unbanning me, and give me a second chance. I would like to be part of the Wikipedia community, not as a "vandal", but as a new, inexperienced, but good-intentioned editor who, simply put, made an honest mistake (honest mistake because I didn't know any better, like I should've, at the time of my mistake). Although I'm inexperienced with Wikipedia's editing layout, I want to be able to contribute to the Wikipedia community and help people learn more about our world. Thank you in advance. (The only edit I've ever made was like 4 years ago to "Crispin: The Cross of Lead; I didn't have an account at the time so it was an anonymous edit, and I just fixed something that wasn't accurate to the book.) Taco The Dank (talk) 01:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have unblocked this account. Welcome back. Please note that Wikipedia is not social media; we're here to write and improve an encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 19:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Google Play[edit]

Hello

I am dropping by to inform you that your contribution to Google Play has been partially reverted. What you added was effectless wikicode (digital junk). The infobox worked with or without it.

Normally, I ignore such things if they are accidents. I mean, why bother a few bytes that have no harms anyway? But for newcomers such as yourself, I make an exception: If you are educated badly, you may end up repeating it under the impression that you are doing fine, and even enter a dispute or edit war over it.

Please study Template:Infobox software/doc to learn how to import external versioning information into {{Infobox software}}.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 07:53, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again

I've scanned your contribution log. It appears you've made the same mistake in the following articles too:

You should really not do this.

Thanks in advance

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 08:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Codename Lisa: Oh, ok thanks. I wasn't aware of that lol Taco The Dank (talk) 23:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]