User talk:Samsbanned/Archive 1

REMOVED: FALSE ACCUSATION "sock|Youreallycan" OFFICIALLY REJECTED BY WIKIPEDIA ADMIN Samsbanned (talk) 06:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

I suspect that it could be my edits to the Iskcon page that have generated this demoniac "sockpuppet" accusation (only the wiki term :). I swear I am not a sockpuppet - I have only one Wikipedia account, one IP address, and one agenda. My edits are made in good faith, hopefully are constructive, removing misinformation and preserving the truth; and as far as the Wikipedia page for the International Society for Krishna Consciousness is concerned, they're aimed at making sure that Krishna Consciousness is presented factually to the public without bias or misrepresentation (it is frequently altered by Mayavadis, Atheists, and one-eyed sectarian religionists alike). I can understand that the history of scandalous behaviour by certain individual initiated devotees of Iskcon may invite malicious editing, but those devotees' unauthorised activities should never be used as a platform to defame the pure activities of Srila Prabhupada whose sole purpose is to deliver the fallen souls from the clutches of Māyā. Instead those criticisms ought be more appropriately directed at the perpetrators, some of whom may very well still be within Iskcon itself, even now.

July 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at International Society for Krishna Consciousness. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AlanS (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

reply to AlanS

...so here's you, AlanS, an Atheist, telling me off for undoing another Atheist's destructive edits to the Iskcon article... well I'll be a monkey's uncle (!)

In my defence, I was merely trying to restore the page that was being trashed by User:198.208.240.246 and as a neophyte I wasn't able to send a warning because the Help page doesn't give clear instructions to newcomers how to locate the other editor's talk page (did it even exist?). It is my first "mistake", next time I'll know what to do to Atheists that use Wikipedia as a vehicle to air their diatribe. Samsbanned (talk) 04:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Me, a sock puppet? Never!

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{1}}}]]. Thank you. Tintta (talk) 02:42, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Is there an Asura in the house?

Obviously someone doesn't like my edits... I use one IP address, one Wikipedia account and I don't even own a desktop computer or a laptop. Everything is done on my mobile devices, and when Wikipedia investigates this they will find that I'm not a sock puppet at all... ...will this be investigated and I'll be cleared when I'm found to be innocent?! (my first sock puppet accusation)

You can defend yourself at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Youreallycan under the section "Comments by other users". Really though, if you aren't innocent, I would be worried about it, because evidence will be found. I looked at your edits and there is absolutely reason to think that you are a sockpuppet. Darylgolden^(talk) 03:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

I don't need to defend myself as my innocence will clear me and this false accusation will be automatically removed... and for the record, I have no idea who "Youreallycan" is. What the...? Samsbanned (talk) 05:02, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Archived by/on Samsbanned (talk) 06:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)