User talk:Safety14

November 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chhath has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chhath was changed by Safety14 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862297 on 2015-11-16T11:30:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nadwan, Patna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nirwanchak for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nirwanchak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirwanchak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not add family albums/ photos of no significance to wikipedia articles. Lakun.patra (talk) 17:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nirwanchak[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Nirwanchak, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Nadwan, Patna. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nadwan, Patna, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lakun.patra (talk) 17:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Safety14, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lakun.patra (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galaxy Kid (talk • contribs) 02:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]