User talk:Ortthornton

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evie Lou (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Festucalex was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evie Lou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

〜 Festucalex • talk 20:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Evie Lou

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Evie Lou, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 22:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ortthornton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead

Referencing above: 1. I did not mean to cause disruption, I am currently on summer break and would like to make edits to a few sites to update ultrarunning race results.

I will not publish the article that caused me to be blocked. I am not affiliated with the site and was not attempting to advertise it.

I will no longer make pages about specific small companies, to avoid being blocked.

I will make useful contributions to areas of experitise, including ultrarunning, psychology, and neuroscience, as I that is where my knowledge lies: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=IvG2AVEAAAAJ&hl=en

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead :Referencing above: 1. I did not mean to cause disruption, I am currently on summer break and would like to make edits to a few sites to update ultrarunning race results. :I will not publish the article that caused me to be blocked. I am not affiliated with the site and was not attempting to advertise it. :I will no longer make pages about specific small companies, to avoid being blocked. :I will make useful contributions to areas of experitise, including ultrarunning, psychology, and neuroscience, as I that is where my knowledge lies: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=IvG2AVEAAAAJ&hl=en |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead :Referencing above: 1. I did not mean to cause disruption, I am currently on summer break and would like to make edits to a few sites to update ultrarunning race results. :I will not publish the article that caused me to be blocked. I am not affiliated with the site and was not attempting to advertise it. :I will no longer make pages about specific small companies, to avoid being blocked. :I will make useful contributions to areas of experitise, including ultrarunning, psychology, and neuroscience, as I that is where my knowledge lies: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=IvG2AVEAAAAJ&hl=en |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead :Referencing above: 1. I did not mean to cause disruption, I am currently on summer break and would like to make edits to a few sites to update ultrarunning race results. :I will not publish the article that caused me to be blocked. I am not affiliated with the site and was not attempting to advertise it. :I will no longer make pages about specific small companies, to avoid being blocked. :I will make useful contributions to areas of experitise, including ultrarunning, psychology, and neuroscience, as I that is where my knowledge lies: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=IvG2AVEAAAAJ&hl=en |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Ortthornton (talk) 16:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ortthornton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I created this page because it was a store in Ohio that was well known, and did not intend it to be an advertisement. I would like to contribute to wikipedia, I will attempt to make better articles. Ortthornton (talk) 13:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ortthornton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologize for any disruption caused. I am currently on summer break and would like to update a few Wikipedia pages with the latest ultrarunning race results. I will not publish the article that led to my being blocked. I am not affiliated with the site and was not attempting to advertise it. To avoid further issues, I will no longer create pages about specific small companies. Instead, I will focus on contributing useful content in my areas of expertise, including ultrarunning, psychology, and neuroscience. This is where my knowledge is most valuable: My Google Scholar Profile. Let me know if you need any further changes!

Decline reason:

Please only make one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ortthornton (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

I really want to contribute as I enjoy writing wiki pages. If there is any way please let me know. Ortthornton (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)