User talk:NN3210

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. McPhail 22:26, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please review Wikipedia's policy on profanity: Wikipedia:Profanity. Thanks! --TheKMan 23:26, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Moe Epsilon/Gallery[edit]

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango 123 (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop vandalizing my user page and sub-pages please? Moe ε 21:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 22:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Template:New Jersey. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nyarkni 23:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to MADtv, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: MADtv was changed by NN3210 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-27T18:36:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mandaluyong City. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mandaluyong City was changed by NN3210 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-28T13:39:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Aqeel[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aqeel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 17:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. J Milburn (talk) 01:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User:Jamesontai. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oxymoron⁸³ 21:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User:Jamesontai, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Oxymoron⁸³ 21:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron⁸³ 21:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]