User talk:MCC1701

Only warning[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brick master is the issue. Look at the edits log. This person is the only one who is insisting it stay their way. I reverted to a version that was in place for YEARS UNTIL Brickmaster demanded the change I’m only doing what was done originally MCC1701 (talk) 06:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a directory. We don't list non-notable names. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn’t address my concern. Look at lists of edits for making the team. You will see it was Brickmaster who started this not me. It is this person who insists on changing it. I want back to its original state. And edits list will show this. Now I want to be unblocked unless you can prove to me Brickmaster was blocked as well. 15:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't matter which way it was before Brickmaster edited. WP:NOT is a policy. You're not going to get it back in it's "original state." OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attempting to continue edit-warring; n ext block will be indefinite[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why the indefinite? I have done nothing since the warning. Please reinstate. MCC1701 (talk) 02:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK|REASON: ABUSE OF WHAT PRIVILEGES? EVER SINCE THE ORIGINAL 72 HOUR BLOCK I HAVE NOT EVEN TRIED TO EDIT. I SWEAR ON MY FAMILY'S GRAVES I HAVE NOT. PLEASE REINSTATE. I HAVE DONE NOTHING TO WARRANT A PERMANENT BLOCK. MCC1701 (talk) 22:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After the 72 hour block on February 28, you triggered the edit filter on April 2, attempting to make the same edit. You were warned clearly that the next block for attempting to make that edit would be indefinite. If you would like to be unblocked, you'll need to (1) Follow the directions in WP:GAB; the above is not a properly formatted unblocked request and (2) convince an admin that you are interested in doing something here besides attempting to resume edit warring on the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders: Making the Team article, logged in or not. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I DONT EVEN CARE ABOUT THAT PAGE ANYMORE. AND NO I DID NOT ATTEMPT ANY EDIT....

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MCC1701 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did nothing wrong to warrant the permanent block. MCC1701 (talk) 17:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2024[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made no edits. only accessed my talk page without being logged in. MCC1701 (talk) 02:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MCC1701 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I regret dealing with Brickmaster. I am sorry for my part in that edit war. I agree with the temp block originally placed on me. Blocking me indefinitely was harsh and i believe not warranted. If my block is lifted then I agree to maintain respect and do only positive contributions. The block is no longer necessary. MCC1701 (talk) 18:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't say what topics you want to edit. PhilKnight (talk) 17:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given that the only thing you've used this account for so far is to evading a previous block, you'll need to (1) explicitly agree to not attempt to attempt to restore your edits to Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders: Making the Team again and (2) you'll need to give us some examples of what kinds of contributions you would make if unblocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The system was not letting do my reasons to unblock me that you requested in response to that request so I am doing them here. I Promise to not ever touch Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders: Making the Team Again. as to examples of positive contributions.....I am not sure what examples you mean as I have not engaged in other pages other than the one in question..... but if I did want to contribute to other pages I would most likely not do major edits, but perhaps when doing an edit, offer it up as an idea or suggestion and back it up with actual facts rather than just simply opinion. Instead of engaging people like Brickmaster I will instead remain silent. It is not worth it. I really do not know what else to say here. All I can do is simply say, no more edit wars. and to back any edits up with facts and links to those facts, and to not do any major editing like that in the edit war with Brickmaster. I am asking that the Indefinite block please be lifted..Thank you. MCC1701 (talk) 04:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MCC1701 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The system was not letting do my reasons to unblock me that you requested in response to that request so I am doing them here. I Promise to not ever touch Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders: Making the Team Again. as to examples of positive contributions.....I am not sure what examples you mean as I have not engaged in other pages other than the one in question..... but if I did want to contribute to other pages I would most likely not do major edits, but perhaps when doing an edit, offer it up as an idea or suggestion and back it up with actual facts rather than just simply opinion. Instead of engaging people like Brickmaster I will instead remain silent. It is not worth it. I really do not know what else to say here. All I can do is simply say, no more edit wars. and to back any edits up with facts and links to those facts, and to not do any major editing like that in the edit war with Brickmaster. I am asking that the Indefinite block please be lifted..Thank you. MCC1701 Addendum to this unblock request: PhilKnight still wants me to bring up topics I would want to edit as some point. I suppose since I have a passion for science fiction I could focus my intent there. To be honest other than Making the Team page I never really tried to edit before. I can be quite passionate about my opinions. I am asking that you please lift the block. I will be touch that page again, and gain I promise to be more careful in the future.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The system was not letting do my reasons to unblock me that you requested in response to that request so I am doing them here. I Promise to not ever touch Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders: Making the Team Again. as to examples of positive contributions.....I am not sure what examples you mean as I have not engaged in other pages other than the one in question..... but if I did want to contribute to other pages I would most likely not do major edits, but perhaps when doing an edit, offer it up as an idea or suggestion and back it up with actual facts rather than just simply opinion. Instead of engaging people like Brickmaster I will instead remain silent. It is not worth it. I really do not know what else to say here. All I can do is simply say, no more edit wars. and to back any edits up with facts and links to those facts, and to not do any major editing like that in the edit war with Brickmaster. I am asking that the Indefinite block please be lifted..Thank you. MCC1701 Addendum to this unblock request: PhilKnight still wants me to bring up topics I would want to edit as some point. I suppose since I have a passion for science fiction I could focus my intent there. To be honest other than Making the Team page I never really tried to edit before. I can be quite passionate about my opinions. I am asking that you please lift the block. I will be touch that page again, and gain I promise to be more careful in the future. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The system was not letting do my reasons to unblock me that you requested in response to that request so I am doing them here. I Promise to not ever touch Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders: Making the Team Again. as to examples of positive contributions.....I am not sure what examples you mean as I have not engaged in other pages other than the one in question..... but if I did want to contribute to other pages I would most likely not do major edits, but perhaps when doing an edit, offer it up as an idea or suggestion and back it up with actual facts rather than just simply opinion. Instead of engaging people like Brickmaster I will instead remain silent. It is not worth it. I really do not know what else to say here. All I can do is simply say, no more edit wars. and to back any edits up with facts and links to those facts, and to not do any major editing like that in the edit war with Brickmaster. I am asking that the Indefinite block please be lifted..Thank you. MCC1701 Addendum to this unblock request: PhilKnight still wants me to bring up topics I would want to edit as some point. I suppose since I have a passion for science fiction I could focus my intent there. To be honest other than Making the Team page I never really tried to edit before. I can be quite passionate about my opinions. I am asking that you please lift the block. I will be touch that page again, and gain I promise to be more careful in the future. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The system was not letting do my reasons to unblock me that you requested in response to that request so I am doing them here. I Promise to not ever touch Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders: Making the Team Again. as to examples of positive contributions.....I am not sure what examples you mean as I have not engaged in other pages other than the one in question..... but if I did want to contribute to other pages I would most likely not do major edits, but perhaps when doing an edit, offer it up as an idea or suggestion and back it up with actual facts rather than just simply opinion. Instead of engaging people like Brickmaster I will instead remain silent. It is not worth it. I really do not know what else to say here. All I can do is simply say, no more edit wars. and to back any edits up with facts and links to those facts, and to not do any major editing like that in the edit war with Brickmaster. I am asking that the Indefinite block please be lifted..Thank you. MCC1701 Addendum to this unblock request: PhilKnight still wants me to bring up topics I would want to edit as some point. I suppose since I have a passion for science fiction I could focus my intent there. To be honest other than Making the Team page I never really tried to edit before. I can be quite passionate about my opinions. I am asking that you please lift the block. I will be touch that page again, and gain I promise to be more careful in the future. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

MCC1701 (talk) 00:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am respectfully asking what the status is with my unblock request. I am not sure what else to do. I was asked to make sure my current responses go on the bottom of my talk page. I do not know if there was a glitch or not but the system was not letting me which is why I simply tried to find a place for my request. Hope this can be resolved soon. Thank you. I regret the edit war and if I find something I feel needs editing I will be more careful in the future. MCC1701 (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:GAB; you don't need to have multiple unblock requests open. There is no deadline on anyone responding to your unblock request. Given your limited history which so far involves nothing but attempted disruption, it's unlikely someone is going to unblock you just in case you find "find something" to edit. You'd have a better chance of being unblocked if you provided a specific example of an edit you would like to make. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]