User talk:ForestH2/Another Archived Discussion

Excuse me?

I have been reverting harmful edits and proposing deletion. That is not deletion. I do not possess such power, which is assigned to admins. Secondly, there is no restriction for "montering" pages. That's why we have watchlists, for Christ's sake.

Lastly, HAVE YOU EVEN SEEN HIS EDITS? I am experienced with editing Kingdom Hearts pages. Using this experience, I am able to conclude that all of his edits are harmful, thus the reverts. For you to slap a butchered test template and threaten me with a block on my talk page on the basis of some newbie whining about his precious pages is shortsighted. This doesn't include the fact that you're absolutely clueless about how Wikipeida works.

For clarification:

1. You get at least three warnings before being blocked, unless it is about obvious vandalism. Those warnings apply to vandalism, which none of my edits fall under.
2. There is no restriction for "montering" pages. Any user can do so.
3. You have absolutely no word in whether I'll be blocked or not. Do not give Kh1fiend assurances that I'd be blocked.
4. Deletion removes page history from public viewing. This power is only given to admins, which I am not one of.
5. DO YOUR RESEARCH BEFORE YOU ACCUSE. Blindly going on someone's word is never a suggested course of action.

' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 23:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

...

Why archive my comments? Ugh.

Kh1fiend created a page that was redundant with Organization XIII already existing. It was debated by experienced editors to have an individual Roxas article on that article's talk page. It was decided not to have one. Kh1fiend, however, ignores any actual attempt at debate, preferring to go with whatever pleases him, ignoring Wikipedia guidelines in the process, including ruining the Roxas disambiguation. I reverted that. He then created Roxas Kingdom hearts, which I then prod-ed. It was moved by another user to Roxas (Kingdom hearts). It didn't disappear anywhere. Is that good enough for you?

There is a difference between my situation and yours. I willfully ignored WP:Civil, but I understood it. You have absolutely no clue of what you're doing: thinking that I'm deleting articles right and left when I don't even have the ability to do so, taking a new user's word on Wikipedia for granted, and presuming to have any authority on whether I'm to be blocked or not.

The name is an aesthetic preference. Deal with it. ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 02:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Sigh

Now you're just resorting to weak threats. Look up what vandalism actually is (as in, mean edit summaries and User talk comments != vandalism), and give some actual discussion beyond "YOUR TRACK REKORD!!!". But, by all means, go ahead and waste an admin's time. ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 03:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Insert random word here!

I don't think you quite get the point of user talk pages; the point of them is to accept comments from other users. Thus, you are finding my comments here. Shock! This has nothing to do with whatever "right" you have to decide what goes on your talk page or archives, or whatnot. Nor am I somehow denying you the right to use archives. I criticize your actions, not deny them. There is a vast difference.

I keep adding comments because your behavior towards me is abhorrent and I don't particularly care to wait for the next conflict for this nonsense to be resolved. I want this out of the way now. Or do we require an admin for you to listen to reason and not hide behind bizarre strawmen like "UR TRAK REKORD" and "MY TALK PAGE! MINE! MINE!" that have no relation whatsoever to my issue with you? ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 14:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

"Fine, were finished."

Reporting me for "vandalism" hours later does not adhere to the meaning of that statement, Forest. This ends now. Either we have a actual discussion instead of restorting to threats and arguments that have no relation ot my criticism of you or we stay out of each other's way from this point on. No, reporting me for "vandalism" does not count as staying out of my way. ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 23:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)