User talk:Emily.white5352/Gas hydrate pingo

Gas Hydrate Pingo Peer Review

1) Lead Section

The lead is concise and clear, fully introducing the article. It doesn't give uneven weight to any other parts of the article. Nothing is redundant and nothing is missing either. The lead certainly reflects the most important information in the article and does a great job of introducing the topic.

2) Structure

The structure is good, with initially explaining the topic and it's background, and then delving into it's impacts. It is a very sensible and clear, and truly guides the reader into fully understanding the topic.

3) Balance of Coverage

Each sections length is equal to its importance to the article's subject. No topic has too much or too little writing addressing it. Additionally, every sentence contributes greatly to the topic, nothing is off-topic. No significant viewpoints are left out or missing, and no conclusions are being drawn trying to persuade the reader. There is a solid balance of coverage.

4) Neutral Content

The article is written in a very unbiased, informative manner, with completely neutral writing. I could not guess your perspective based on reading the article which is good. The article also does not focus on too much negative or positive information. The neutral presentation of content was executed flawlessly.

5) References

The sources are reliable journal and textbook articles, and most statements in the article are connected to them. The statements are also connected to 6 sources, with a fairly even spread of information between articles, thus showing no unbalance. I can find all of the statements in the references, thus they are presented accurately. One thing to improve could be fixing the formatting of the references section, where right now there is a warning saying "Check date values in:". I had a similar issue initially, and it can be fixed by editing the individual reference and fixing the format of the date, for example to be "February 2018" instead of "18-02". Overall you did a great job utilizing a lot of reliable sources in an accurate, and balanced manner.

P7r7m (talk) 17:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)