User talk:EWI

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopaedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 14:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The merits of the link are inconsequential; the fact that you have connections to the organization make it spamming and against policy. The argument against someone else adding EWI is that there's already a US based welding association link on the page (the AWS, which has been around for 65 more years than EWI). The other two links are there because they provide a more global perspective, although admittedly the Canada link is weak. Furthermore, the EWI website gives no additional information about welding itself, it merely describes the organization. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 15:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, see Wikipedia:External links. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 15:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I should request clarification from the Wikipedia management. I disagree with your perspective about excluding EWI as an additional link on the page. If necessary, I'm sure another Welding expert or authority unconnected to EWI would agree that it should be added to the page. As a new contributor to Wikipedia I am not completely versed on its spamming policy. By no means, do I intend to spam the site. I would like rules of fair play to apply to the page. EWI provides many pages of information on Welding and I repeat is similar to The Welding Institute in its mission to assist those in need of weling R&D.EWI

There really isn't any "management"; things are determined by consensus. I've been around here for over a year and a half, am an administrator, and have participated in numerous debates over external links. I understand that you aren't trying to spam, but if you notice in the WP:EL policy, external links are supposed to add something to the article. Wikipedia is not a link farm, so the idea is not to create a listing of links to related topics but to include links that our readers will find useful. I don't see any reason that a general reader looking for information on welding would find the EWI website helpful. People looking for welding organizations can look on google, or on a wikipedia article specific to welding organizations or even EWI itself. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 15:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you point me to some of the pages that you say include welding information? I looked around on the site for a few minutes but couldn't find anything. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 15:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Edison Welding Institute[edit]

Edison Welding Institute, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Edison Welding Institute satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edison Welding Institute and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Edison Welding Institute during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. New England ^{Review Me!}/Go Red Sox! 02:08, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]