User talk:Bloopyfloop

February 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal life, timothée chalamet[edit]

it is highly unnecessary to include a multiple paragraph quote from a barely 1 year relationship, in his personal life section. Not a single editor has ever done that, kindly leave the section as is. Soe743edits (talk) 19:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not unnecessary, it is a direct quote from Chalamet about the relationship which he viewed as significant. This is very normal across personal life sections in many celebrity's pages. Bloopyfloop (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleasing (May 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pleasing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bloopyfloop! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pleasing (brand) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pleasing (brand). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleasing (brand) (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheTechie were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please don't make your quotes excessively long.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pleasing (brand) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 23:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

		The Turning Wikipedia Green Barnstar
		Thanks for your work on Harry Styles-related articles and for turning Wikipedia green! Keep up the great work. Medxvo (talk) 07:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated! Thank you for all you do too! Bloopyfloop (talk) 09:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cultural impact of Harry Styles (June 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This is already covered in the main article so I suggest starting a discussion at Harry Styles to gain consensus a fork is warranted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cultural impact of Harry Styles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]