User talk:209.244.187.154

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures Game, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -Painezor 02:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hurter Monkey / Goodbling and the Hip-Hop-Opotamus on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Indolences 08:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Third Temple

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Third Temple. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. I reverted the section you added on "The myth of record destruction". Wikipedia requires reliable sources for content and requires presenting different viewpoints neutrally. These policies prohibit unsourced content claiming that widely held views are myths. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 22:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Black Hebrew Israelites. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 20:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Mr. Darcy talk 21:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

May 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charlemagne. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lova Falk talk 17:52, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Charlemagne. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 17:56, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Martin Van Buren. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 18:10, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 18:12, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

---