Jump to content

User:Heyjorge102/Transcortical sensory aphasia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Proposal: Transcortical sensory aphasia

Presented by: Kristen Marcet, George Hakimeh, Kaitlin Qualls, and Alexandra Campanelli

Main Points[edit]

General Definition[edit]

Transcortical sensory aphasia is caused by lesions in the inferior portion of the left temporal lobe of the brain, usually due to infarcts, hemorrhages, and contusions of the left posterior cerebral artery. This type of aphasia is very similar to Wernicke’s aphasia in that patients exhibit poor comprehension and naming, have fluent spontaneous speech, and exhibit paraphasia. However, transcortical sensory aphasia differs from Wernicke’s aphasia in that patients still have intact repetition and exhibit echolalia (compulsive repetition of words).

Clinical Assessment[edit]

  • Comprehension
  • Naming
  • Repetition
  • Distinguishing Criteria
    • Symptoms
    • Brain Anatomy

Pathophysiology[edit]

  • Neuropathology
  • Lichtheim’s model

Diagnosis[edit]

  • Criteria
  • Techniques
    • Imaging

Management[edit]

  • Pharmaceutical
  • Therapy

Epidemiology[edit]

Current Research[edit]

History[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Sarno, Martha T. Acquired Aphasia. New York: Academic, 1981. pp 61.
  2. Drislane, Frank W., Michael Benatar, Bernard S. Chang, Juan A. Acosta, John E. Croom, Andrew Tarulli, and Louis R. Caplan. Blueprints Neurology. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006. Print.
  3. Nadeau, Stephen E., Leslie J. Rothi, and Bruce Crosson. Aphasia and Language: Theory to Practice. New York: Guilford, 2000. pp 15—17
  4. Banich, Marie T., and Rebecca J. Compton. Cognitive Neuroscience. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth / Cengage Learning, 2011. pp 238—241.
  5. Boatman, D., B. Gordon, J. Hart, O. Selnes, D. Miglioretti, and F. Lenz. "Transcortical Sensory Aphasia: Revisited and Revised." Brain 123.8 (2000): 1634-42. Pubmed. Web. Sept.-Oct. 2011.

Division of workload[edit]

We have decided to meet weekly, that way we can review and correct each other’s work, share our individual research findings, and therefore create a cohesive article. The workload will be divided up by subtopic, and each group member will be in charge of completing one or two of the subtopic (depending on length).