In this context i.e. multiple vandalisms by someone with strong POV then no I don't think ZZ should be censured. If shockingly is particularly uncivil in your dialect of English then a note to that affect on ZZ talk page might be more appropriate. e.g. Hi ZZ, I like the way you handled the sigh clone thing, but before you use that phrase again I thought you might want to know that in this part of the world shockingly is a euphemism for a police statement made under the influence of electricity. Jonathan Cardy (talk) 12:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
If anything the term is accurate, it is rather shocking that it's possible that someone could be that convinced of something so very incorrect. In this case I think WP:AGF should be extended to ZZ, I would be shocked too to encounter this Felixmeister (talk) 05:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Really, I'm shockingly disappointed that a heated debate unfurls over shockingly. It really doesn't seem to be that uncivil. -- Banjeboi 10:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
I simply do not see the problem. And as for the "sigh-clone" guy, his unending insistence on arguing this point is an abuse of talk pages. Richwales (talk · contribs) 02:54, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Wow, a "shockingly" large amount of time was wasted on this. With a thing like this, people are making borderline uncivil comments right and left. Why latch on to one? unless, of course, ZZ really is a jerk, always. Eman235/talk 05:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
