Jump to content

Template talk:Infobox United States District Court case

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Holding" field not working?[edit]

 Fixed

The "holding" parameter does not appear to work. For example, Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc., Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, & McLean v. Arkansas (just to pick the first three transclusions in the list at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Infobox United States District Court case) all include holdings; but the holding does not appear in the infobox. Specifying the "holding" parameter does cause the heading Holding to appear; but not the text of the holding itself. TJRC (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I figured it out and fixed it. Please revert and let me know if this munges anything. TJRC (talk) 02:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone add a "plaintiff" field?[edit]

Can someone add a "plaintiff" field? I would do it myself, but I do not want to accidentally break a complex template. Right now we have "prosecution" and "defendant" - and "prosecution" is clearly incorrect in a civil case. Thanks --Neutralitytalk 03:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why no "counsel for defendant" field?[edit]

or counsel for defendants(s) Thanks Rhadow (talk) 12:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was unable to get the image to load for DDC when leaving image and imagesize blank[edit]

USA vs whoever
CourtUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia
Full case nameUSA vs whoever
Defendantwhoever
PlaintiffUnited States of America
Citation1 U.S.C. § 2.
Court membership
Judge sittingJudge Judge

Geo8rge (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The problem seems to be the infobox template was not updated to include the image variable discussed in Template:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case#Technical_information. In my sandbox that code solved the problem. I don't know if I should make the change without authorization. Should I? Geo8rge (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]