Template:Did you know nominations/Obesity Reviews
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 13:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Insufficient recent expansion
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Obesity Reviews[edit]
- ... that the journal Obesity Reviews is the highest-ranked obesity-related journal by impact factor, according to the Journal Citation Reports?
Created/expanded by Jinkinson (talk). Self nominated at 21:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC).
Not even close to 1500 prose characters, and the hook is not in the article - the article says the journal describes itself as the highest-ranked obesity-related journal, but the Journal Citation Reports is a separate thing as currently presented. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, thanks for pointing that out. I probably never should have nominated this, and you can consider this nomination withdrawn. I didn't remember the 1500 word rule when I was nominating this. Jinkinson talk to me 23:12, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
