Talk:Troll Airfield/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wackywace ^{converse | contribs} 18:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

My only reservation about the article is the lack of images, but I understand that it would be incredibly difficult to get a free image of the airfield given its remote nature. I've added some links to external images, though, so I think that should suffice. Overall, for such an obscure airport, this is a detailed and well-written article. Wackywace ^{converse | contribs} 18:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]