Talk:Sweetums (Parks and Recreation)

Sweetums (Parks and Recreation) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Sweetums (Parks and Recreation) is part of the Parks and Recreation (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 24, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
January 18, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 17, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ron Swanson builds a harp in the Parks and Recreation episode "Sweetums", which was inspired by actor Nick Offerman's real-life carpentry skills?

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Parks and Recreation characters#Ben|Ben]] The anchor (#Ben) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Orphaned references in Sweetums (Parks and Recreation)[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Sweetums (Parks and Recreation)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "EW":

From Pawnee Zoo: Fog, Henning (2009-09-18). ""Parks and Recreation" recap: Change we can believe in". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2009-09-22.
From Leslie's House: Gonzalez, Sandra (January 22, 2010). ""Parks and Recreation" recap: House party at Leslie's!". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved January 22, 2010.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural References Quibble[edit]

This is purely an academic point: I'm not sure that the first line of the culture references belongs in this section. I'm talking about the continued conflict between the library and parks staff. It seems self-referential rather than a cultural reference. I didn't delete it, but it probably belongs elsewhere in the article.Obamafan70 (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sweetums (Parks and Recreation)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arctic Night 08:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

General comments[edit]

First sentence of 'Plot': should 'parks and recreation' be capitalised? Later on in that section it is. Not sure what the actual spelling is.
I capitalized it. — Hun ter Ka hn 15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In the lead, 'sweetums' is not capitalised, whilst in the plot section it is. I think this should be consistent.
- I also capitalized this. — Hun ter Ka hn 15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the first sentence of 'Cultural references' there is a reference to an earlier episode. Is this really 'cultural'? I wouldn't say so, as it's a self-reference!
I think this should be reworded: "Leslie tells Ron she had already written a eulogy for him and it starts".
- A similar issue came up at Talk:Galentine's Day. I explained my reasoning there, so please take a look at that discussion and see if you agree. If you don't, let me know and we'll figure out the best way to deal with it... — Hun ter Ka hn 15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
According to Wikipedia:Citing sources#When quoting someone, you should cite the quotation immediately after the quotation itself. I know it's a little pedantic - see User:Ealdgyth/GA review cheatsheet for reasoning. For example, 'Matt Fowler of IGN called it a "fantastic episode"' should be 'Matt Fowler of IGN called it a "fantastic episode".^[12]'.
- I think I got them all. — Hun ter Ka hn 15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The final paragraph of 'Reception' contains the word 'said' five times by my count. You may like to consider cutting it down, although this won't really affect a pass/fail or anything.
- I replaced some, let me know if we need more. — Hun ter Ka hn 15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the word 'propaganda' sounds like it's pushing a bit of a POV. However, according to propaganda, the videos shown in the episode were essentially just that, propaganda, so I can't really think of anything better to say. Never mind.
- Ok. lol — Hun ter Ka hn 15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I know I've already said it, but remember to cite those quotations, especially the one from The Star-Ledger!
- Ok. — Hun ter Ka hn 15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The image in the infobox should probably have some alt text. See WP:ALT#Essence for help.
- Added. — Hun ter Ka hn 15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fix these issues up and I'll happily pass this article. I can't find anything else wrong here. Arctic Night 09:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, passed. Arctic Night 11:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]