Talk:Sutphin Boulevard–Archer Avenue–JFK Airport station/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Username6892 (talk · contribs) 04:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I will review this article. Username6892 04:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- For the reasons elaborated here, I don't think this should be a good article. There are way too many problems with sourcing, coverage, and copyright violations, in addition to the fact that loads more can be written about the history and station layout. There was also no consultation with the major editors of this page (me and Kew Gardens 613). This looks no better than a start-class page. epicgenius (talk) 13:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Quick fail criteria[edit]
This article definitely meets at least 2 of the criteria to be quick failed:
1. Long way from meeting any one of the six: Not sure, possibly for 1b.
2. Contains copyvios: Yes
3. Has/Needs cleanup banners which are unquestionably still valid. Yes, I added quite a few of them. The text that is a copyvio is very cluttered and needs cleanup. I think the entire station layout section (Except for the exits) needs to be rewritten and sourced properly (One web citation with no url?) The image should be relocated to lessen the clutter.
4. It is unstable due to edit warring: No
Other things needed[edit]
This doesn't cover all of the criteria, just that which I found to be lacking (I didn't do a full review as this is quickfailed)
Lead[edit]
The lead is way too long (It is nearly a third of the prose)
History[edit]
Divided into subsections when it really doesn't need to be
Station layout[edit]
Only one sentence that isn't in the Exits subsection is cited, which uses a web citation template with no url
Exits[edit]
On the southeast corner, two escalators and a staircase going up outside the Long Island Rail Road's Jamaica station.
Source material doesn't mention escalators
Bus connections[edit]
No source
I haven't done much of a source and image review, but this needs large improvement before it can be renominated. Username6892 14:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)