Talk:State Route 346 (New York–Vermont)/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

• WP:LEAD introduces new information - The name of US-7 (Ethan Allen Highway). Also, please add (Route 346) after "New York State Route 346 and Vermont Route 346". Also, you added Vermont after the VT city/county, but not NY after Town of Petersburgh in Rensselaer County; be consistent.
• Both paragraphs of your RD start the same way, can you mix it up? Do we know who owns the railroad tracks that VT 346 crosses? In the RD you use a mix of Route and NY xx, please pick one and be consistent.
• In the history, "By the time 1965 came around" doesn't sound very encyclopedic

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   You use a traffic report as a ref, but can you add the actual AADT info into the article, for both NY and VT?

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   getting a picture would be nice as well, but not a requirement.

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold awaiting improvements. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

That has traffic data counts not report - Mitch32^(UP) 17:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Addendum: The report site went down, so that is unaccessible right now.Mitch32^(UP) 17:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Changes have been made. Passing --Admrboltz (talk) 18:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)