Talk:Scirus
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Like a product brochure[edit]
This article reads like a product brochure.
Comparison with CiteSeer and Google Scholar[edit]
An anon editor has requested a comparison of Scirus with CiteSeer and Google Scholar be added. Nurg (talk) 06:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Physical contacting info.....???[edit]
--222.64.23.7 (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
If it can be contacted via Elsevier, then the website should be co-logoed to maintain its integrity.
My opinion about the engine against Google scholar[edit]
The search criteria are better designed than Google scholar. However, the search mode is worse than Google scholar as the settings are always fliking back to default ones--222.64.23.7 (talk) 06:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
In terms of the speed of eye's screening to the search results, the Google scholar is far better than this service--222.64.23.7 (talk) 06:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)