Talk:Panther Model 100
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
New Category for British Motorcycles[edit]
As part of the Motorcycling WikiProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes. To make things easier to sort out I have created a category for British motorcycles. Please will you add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create. It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing. I've linked the Category to the Commons British Motorcycles so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons - take your camera next time you go to a rally! Thanks Tony (talk) 18:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- No, actually WP:Categorization explains how articles should be categorized. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Merge the 4 Panther 100 articles?[edit]
I'd like to suggest that we could get a good article by a well thought out merge of the four Panther 100 articles - but lets have some views before I do anything please Tony (talk) 18:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Repair manual advice deleted[edit]
Please see WP:NOTMANUAL. Specifications like wheelbase, rake, trail, horsepower, etc are within the scope of describing the subject. Giving valve inlet timing, carburetor settings, and other repair and maintenance data is not encyclopedic. Similarly, engine numbers, frame numbers, etc, are not what an encyclopedia is for. Even if such data were within the scope of this article, we cannot use exact copes of the source material, with the same formatting, same headings, same order, etc. That is a copyright violation, per WP:COPYVIO. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)