Talk:No. 7 (brand)

It is requested that an image or photograph of No. 7 (brand) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in the United Kingdom may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from No. 7 (brand) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 December 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "Sexy Lady" by Jessie J reached #22 on the UK Singles Chart after it was featured in a Boots No. 7 advert, despite not being physically released as a single?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sexy Lady (Jessie J song).

Wikipedia

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Matrixyl[edit]

This article should either mention or point to matrixyl, no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.51.51 (talk) 09:16, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why? What's the relevance?--Laun chba ller 17:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 November 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. 7 (brand) → No7 – The article was renamed without discussion. I reverted it back. Now I would like your opinions. If I see a unanimous opposition, I will withdrawal the proposal if I can. George Ho (talk) 20:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, should be no absolute topic for any number No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.8 No.9, though No.10 redirects to Downing Street which is fair enough. Can someone add an image? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as it makes more sense to have No7 redirect to the disabig page. No rationale has been given to do otherwise. Dicklyon (talk) 02:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.