Talk:Neurobiotics

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

I checked the first cite and found that Kandel has not coined this term. At least nothing can be found in the given reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.100.10.113 (talk) 16:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blank and redirect notice due to notability issues[edit]

There is little to no prevalence of the term neurobiotics in the field of neuroscience: a search of the term yields a single result on PubMed and none on Google Books, and almost every hit on a Google search is either quoting the current definition on this Wikipedia article or selling a product. Given the lack of reliable references and the description of neurobiotics here as "the study of the nervous system in conjunction with technology", I am going to blank and redirect neurobiotics to neurotechnology—other conceivable redirect targets could be neural engineering, neuroinformatics or neurorobotics.

If you believe these two are sufficiently distinct and would like to dissociate the field of neurobiotics from neurotechnology, please make sure to add evidence of notability to avoid excessive overlap between articles. Cffisac (talk) 03:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]