Talk:Mono (mixtape)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mono (mixtape) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Mixtape vs. Album[edit]

In ictu oculi, may I ask why you changed the to album? It's marketed as a mixtape and is labeled as such by the sources listed on the article. Commercial mixtapes are a thing and this was one of them, so I'm not sure how it being commercially released changes the fact that it's a mixtape. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)} 03:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a subcategory of album and there are other albums of this name. Per previous (mixtape) RMs. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:27, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 August 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. There is consensus that the proposed name is in line with the WP:ALBUMDAB guideline. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 06:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mono (RM album) → Mono (mixtape) – Per WP:ALBUMDAB: Use "(mixtape)" for mixtapes. According to third party reliable sources such as Billboard, The Korea Herald, United Press International, and Vulture, this is a mixtape. If there is a notable mixtape with the same title by another artist, Mono (RM mixtape) is fine with me. 221.187.107.208 (talk) 20:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there are 2 albums and mixtape is therefore not sufficient. ALBUMDAB has not been the subject of consensus discussion. And does not override other rules. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fun fact #1. This writing was posted by an user years ago. It had no consensus and you abused it for moving pages to your preferred style regardless if disambiguation was required or not solely because the writing was ambiguous, you, of course, had no problem with it.
Fun fact #2. The current writing of WP:ALBUMDAB was built and rewritten with consensus, based upon the decisions of multiple RMs and RFC. Despite being built with consensus, as it prevents you from doing what you used to do, now you consider it "illegal". © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 19:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per nom. If sources call it a mixtape and not an album, it should be labeled as such. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 19:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also agree with it being renamed as a mixtape as per the evidence provided to support such. I'm surprised that this is even being contested tbh. There was literally only one user in the first discussion, so how the conclusion that a consensus was reached is beyond me. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per everyone above as well as sources presented. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 22:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per naming convention and sources provided. Personal dislike of community accepted guidelines should have no bearing on these discussions; if you don't like it, start an RfC. PC78 (talk) 22:26, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.