This article was nominated for deletion on 1 June 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
The topic of Puempel's notability was brought up after a proposed deletion and the reason given was Failure to meet the criteria of NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG absent routine coverage.. From the article of routine coverage: "WP:Run-of-the-mill events — common, everyday, ordinary items that do not stand out — are probably not notable." The CHL Rookie of the Year award isn't really everyday in my opinion as its a prestigious yearly award. From WP:NHOCKEY: "4. Achieved preeminent honours (all-time top ten career scorer, won a major award given by the league, first team all-star, All-American) in a lower minor league such as the Central Hockey League or the United Hockey League, in a major junior league such as those of the Canadian Hockey League, or in a major collegiate hockey league" and I'd define the CHL Rookie of the Year award as a major award. Ho-ju-96 (talk) 09:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't. The intent of the phrase when drafted was something comparable to "all-time top ten career scorer" or "first team all-star" - to wit, a league MVP, best defenseman or best goaltender, all of whom would reasonably be first team all-stars. Ravenswing 09:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note. RGtraynor found this article because Jerry D'Amigo is under deletion review here and he qualifies under won NCAA rookie of the year much like Puempel. RGtrayor is the only one in the discussion to think that Rookie of the Year isn't notable and when I pointed out this article being notable he then PROD it when I told him it won't survive an afd (which it won't). You have nothing to worry about this article isn't going anywhere.--Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 12:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
CHL Rookie of the Year - why are we even discussing deletion? If this is sourced, that's notability enough. It's the top amateur league, in Canada, under the NHL. CycloneGU (talk) 03:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
