Talk:Jean-Baptiste Bernard Viénot de Vaublanc

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Haiti Low‑importance

	Haiti portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Haiti, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Haiti-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HaitiWikipedia:WikiProject HaitiTemplate:WikiProject HaitiHaiti articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Translated[edit]

I have translated this from the text on the French page. I am afriad the translation may be rather imperfect in places due to the nature of the original. The article could do with a rewrite, but I would not say I know enough about the period, let alone the person, to do so myself. I was unable to put the references in as I do not know how to and I have not had the time to proof read it. Thanks. Spite & Malice 12:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible style[edit]

This article needs to be re-written in a prose style. The timeline style is not how biographical articles should be written. We also need to give better context to what is stated in the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]