Talk:Gottschalk of Aachen

@StAnselm: I don't think we need hatnotes at the Gottschalk articles. I think they are all unambiguously titled. See WP:NAMB. I also don't think the practice can be maintained as the number of medieval Gottschalks increases. See de:Gottschalk for several others. Srnec (talk) 00:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think Gottschalk of Orbais is the primary topic. He's not usually referred to in that way, and so the hatnote is important to make it clear that Gottschalk of Aachen is not the Gottschalk. St Anselm (talk) 01:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]