Talk:Eudromaeosauria

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Klaporte.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dates of the earliest Eudromaeosauria[edit]

The earliest Eudromaeosauria is given as 143m years ago. However the earliest Velociraptorinae is given as 151m years ago. My understanding is that the former is a clade including all the latter, given that there is an inconsistency with these dates CptPugwash (talk) 22:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposals[edit]

Support: The exact internal topology of eudromaeosauria is contentious to say the least. The three subfamilies are consistently found to include wildly different taxa based on which matrix is used. The only non-eponymous taxa that have stable placement in the dromaeosaur family tree are Kuru and Shri I believe. All other taxa have been found to have multiple possible classifications. In order to consolidate this discussion to a single place, rather than dispersed across 3-4 pages (WP:KEEPCONCISE, WP:REDUNDANT), I propose this merge. Furthermore, the large degree of uncertainty in the composition of the three subfamilies proposed for the merge poses neutrality issues. There is basically no scientific consensus about where these taxa go, other than within Eudromaeosauria, so a merge is the most neutral position (WP:NPOV, WP:N). A Cynical Idealist (talk) 07:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on a draft of the proposed merge in my sandbox here. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 07:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]