Talk:Episode 5569

Episode 5569 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 25, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Television: Hollyoaks Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hollyoaks task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Episode 5569/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

What is the image's purpose? (WP:NFCCP#8)
- I implemented it to illustrate two of the Black characters/actresses involved – if you don't think it's crucial to the understanding of the article then I'm fine with removing it! – DarkGlow • 14:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prose seems to explain it just fine so I suggest removing it. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done – DarkGlow • 19:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other than that, infobox looks good.
"everyday" → "every day"
- Done – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Link racial injustices in the United Kingdom.
- Done – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"well received" → "well-received"
- Done – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot and cast[edit]

If there is a cast section, actor names should not be mentioned in the plot (WP:FILMPLOT also applies to television).
- Done but do you think the cast section should now come before the plot? – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, but maybe merging both sections would work best to have consistency with other articles. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you point to some examples? Every soap episode article I've seen formats it like this (with actor names in the plot) so I'm not well versed in how it should look. – DarkGlow • 16:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, in television articles I have looked at, the plot has the names of each actor in parenthesis, while omitting the use of #Cast. However, if you decide to have a cast section, it is found redundant by MOS to include the names of each actor also in #Plot. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done – DarkGlow • 19:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That being said, the plot section is under 400 words, so that passes WP:TVPLOT.
Remove the comma after "decision" as the sentence is already short.
- Done – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that serial commas were being used in the lead, so add one after "Alan, Patsy".
- Done – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production[edit]

Remove the comma after "Blackwood in the episode" (short sentence).
- Done – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"were she reveals" → "where she reveals"
- Done – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Everything else looks great (well-sourced section).
- Thank you! – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

Remove the comma after the first use of the United Kingdom.
- Done – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"which Black people" → "that Black people"
- Done – DarkGlow • 15:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Sources are archived.

Progress[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·