Talk:Clapeyron's theorem (elasticity)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move 6 June 2024[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Clapeyron's theorem (elasticity) be renamed and moved to Clapeyron's theorem. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Clapeyron's theorem (elasticity) → Clapeyron's theorem – If this is the WP:PRITOP for "Clapeyron's theorem", then it should be at that title. If it isn't, then Clapeyron's theorem should be converted from a redirect into a disambiguation page. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 21:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There is also Clapeyron's Theorem of three moments, and the Clapeyron equation, also known as the Clausius–Clapeyron relation. Polyamorph (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support. From my cursory search, it seems that the theorem of three moments is only intermittently described by sources as "Clapeyron's theorem of three moments", whereas this theorem appears to be called "Clapeyron's theorem" exclusively. From this, my impression is that it would follow logically for this theorem to be the primary topic for "Clapeyron's theorem"; a hatnote should suffice for pointing readers to the other topic. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)