Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KissmeKate/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


KissmeKate

KissmeKate (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
15 August 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Hekerui [edit]

The vote on the GA/FA nomination on the German Wiki for Manuel Rivera-Ortiz was abridged on account of suspected sock puppetry of KissmeKate, SwissLawyer, and Fotografenauge intended to push a result - see here. This and two other have acted on the English Wiki to push GA/FA nominations and have the following similarities:

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims. I only saw this allegation just now. SwissLawyer and I are different persons, even though we live in the same house. He is a lawyer and I am an economist. The other users are not me. I have indeed contacted the photographer in question to obtain his permission to publish his photographs in Wikipedia. KissmeKate (talk) 19:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

Looking at the history of Talk:Manuel Rivera-Ortiz/GA1 here, the sock puppetry is fairly evident. All registered accounts indefinitely blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 22:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


05 September 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]



Evidence submitted by Hekerui [edit]

looks like block evasion - global contributions conclusive, had article on glwiki deleted because local admin came to the same conclusion about sockpuppetry and promotional activity Hekerui (talk) 21:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

 Confirmed

Technically, Kinglear (talk · contribs) is Red X Unrelated; I'll leave it to an independent admin to determine if unblocking is warranted due to the behavioral evidence given in the previous SPI. –MuZemike 21:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


13 October 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]



Evidence submitted by DeltaQuad [edit]

Hits WP:Duck IMO. This addition of info on the SPI page and admited sock right here. -- DQ (t) (e) 01:50, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]