Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals
| ||||||||||
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | WikiProject Academic Journals was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 21 November 2011. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia[edit]
Acta zool. cracov. is on the list of most-cited journals that don't have an article, in the top 10. However in trying to remedy the missing page I found barely anything independent about it, not even a list of places it's indexed. Has anyone else tried to document this before and ran into the same issues I've had? (For anyone interested, I've made a draft: Draft:Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia) Reconrabbit 20:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- http://www.isez.pan.krakow.pl/en/acta-zoologica.html says Indexed in: BIOSIS Previews, Zoological Record, AGRO, Index Copernicus International, PBN - Polska Bibliografia Naukowa. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- According to Clarivate's Master Journal List, this journal is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, and the Zoological Record. That makes it (borderline) notable, I think. --Randykitty (talk) 09:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Half of the journals in Polish Academy of Sciences#Periodicals doesn't list an impact factor. In case their notability is disputed, they could all be merged into a new List of Polish Academy of Sciences academic journals. fgnievinski (talk) 00:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
This AFD could use some input from knowledgeable editors. --Randykitty (talk) 08:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Relisted for a third time, please participate in the discussion. --Randykitty (talk) 16:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
This one, too. --Randykitty (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- It has now been relisted twice with still only minimal participation. --Randykitty (talk) 21:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:TACL#Requested move 12 March 2024[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:TACL#Requested move 12 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Brusquedandelion (talk) 01:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
If people could comment on this, that would be great. It's an obvious case IMO but people are bringing weird arguments into it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases[edit]
I started an article on the journal Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, based on a translation from the German Wikipedia. I have a question about the ISO 4 abbreviation. Should the B of borne in the abbreviation be a cap, as it is in the German Wikipedia? Also, the impact factor from 2014 is out of date, but I don't know where to find a more current value. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the infobox caps, yes, we capitalize systematically. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
There is a content disagreement on this article's talk page concerning the section on its academic journal Occupational Health Science. The issue is discussed in this section of the article's talk page. The participation of knowledgeable editors would be welcome. --Randykitty (talk) 18:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Some of you may have some thoughts on the proposed bot task. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
The journal,The Black Scholar, has been COI-ridden for many, many years. When asked, the editor admitted to their COI and seems receptive to feedback on the article talk page. More eyes on this would be helpful for cleanup/NPOV purposes. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 21:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Feddes Repertorium - Journal of Botanical Taxonomy and Geobotany[edit]
The journal Feddes Repertorium does not have an article in the English Wikipedia, but does in a few other languages. It is indexed in Scopus and has a page on Wikidata at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5643138 The title and subtitle have changed over the years. Would it make sense to start by translating the corresponding article from (say) the Portuguese Wikipedia at pt:Feddes Repertorium, or do you see any reason why there should not be an English article about the journal? Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Draft:JCO Global Oncology[edit]
Could someone please take a look at Draft:JCO Global Oncology? 08:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC) LeapTorchGear (talk) 08:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there! Should you not add each section as a numbered list instead of listing each index and anoting them with (*) a source. You should insert a link for each index using a simple table list with each their own linkAbstracting and indexing
- Abstracting and indexing
- The journal is abstracted and indexed in:
- Embase
- Scopus
- I think you could leave it as is, but annotation mark [*] usually are for source references at the botom of the page, as these sources are the project itself as a reference. A source should not rely on itself? SirlupinwatsonIII (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
2023 IFs[edit]
The 2023 IFs have been put online today. The yearly update challenge begins... --Randykitty (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Commentationes Societatis Physico-Medicae apud Universitatem Litteratum Caesaream Mosquensem Institutae Commentat. Soc. Phys.-Med. Univ. Litt. Caes. Mosq.[edit]
Commentat. Soc. Phys.-Med. Univ. Litt. Caes. Mosq. is an early-19th-century Russian journal in which Georg Franz Hoffmann published nine descriptions of new species. See https://www.ipni.org/p/20068-2 Some partial volumes are available through Google Books. https://books.google.com/books?id=_9hYAAAAcAAJ and https://books.google.com/books?id=CNlYAAAAcAAJ I know it's an important journal, but I don't know how to prove it's notable by Wikipedia standards. Its ISSN is 2221-3686, assigned by the Russian ISSN Centre in 2015. I started a Wikidata page: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q126807606 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)