Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dolomite-Magnésite- Navarre.jpg

Reason: Large, high EV, high quality, a lead image and already featured on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Dolomite
FP category for this image: Sciences/Materials science or Geology
Creator: Didier Descouens

Support as nominator --I'ḏ ♥One 20:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional support I could go with this. It’s very sharp and well lit. And it is part of an interesting discipline I personally haven’t seen much of here. But check out the histogram. There was no reason for them to have done that for this subject. Greg L (talk) 20:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've been waiting for you to say what's wrong. Is it how all the settings seem to have been turned down? My guess is so that the white parts wouldn't appear to be glowing. --I'ḏ ♥One 20:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, that'll do me. I'd be inclined to put it under Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology, but it's worthy of FP status for me. J Milburn (talk) 22:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Good idea, I was expecting to see pictures of mountains or something in geology.. =\ --I'ḏ ♥One 22:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've always been a fan of good geology photos; this one strikes me as particularly good. --Lucas Brown 02:40, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for clarification Makeemlighter (talk) 03:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, 4 supports isn't enough. That's why we're waiting on Greg. Makeemlighter (talk) 05:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support I’m not going to hold this one up by whining over a minor exposure issue. We need more mineralogy-related photos. We also need more participation at FPC. My “oppose” vote shouldn’t have busted this over a short quorum. Greg L (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dolomite-Magnésite-_Navarre.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 04:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]