Jump to content

User talk:Vrenator: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DITWIN GRIM (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Welcome ==
== Welcome ==
to Tylers world <big><3</big>
































































<!-- Template:Welcomelaws -->
<!-- Template:Welcomelaws -->
;Welcome!
;Welcome!

Revision as of 15:43, 24 September 2010

Welcome

to Tylers world <3

































Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date).

User page

Many thanks for removing the vandalism. Pinethicket (talk) 12:24, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vrenator, Can you Leave Charles on for the day, it's his birthday. He's part Welsh! Thanks, Yorkville —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yorkville (talkcontribs) 16:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion

Cheers for the suggestion, but every time i clicked "preview", it came out as i wanted it to. So i'd click "save" and it'd be slightly off. I'm sure somebody else can perfect what i was trying to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.166.222.163 (talk) 11:35, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello, this is to let you know that you have made a little mistake in reverting the wrong edit here. FYI, the IP editor (218.186.8.234) was actually correct in reverting the other IP editor (218.186.8.238) until you came along. Per WP:SYN, you cannot quote a different figure/statement from that of the quoted sources (provided here & here), please be more careful in future, thank you. Best. --Dave ♠♣♥♦№1185♪♫™ 17:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Rollback

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-reviewing

I noticed you auto reviewed both this and this edit as reviewed. Obviously one isn't right. The editor undid their own edits, but I'd suggest you be careful when reviewing pages, particularly when editors change factual errors. Shadowjams (talk) 09:11, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Many thanks, Vrenator, for all you do on Wikipedia—especially keeping my personal pages free of vandalism!!! Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 10:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I noticed this user Bjoh249 (talk) vandalizing a couple of articles that I edit on Wikipedia. Another editor went ahead and reverted his/her edits. How does someone report a repeat offender? As you can see on his/her talk page, another editor has already warned him twice. What can be done? CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 21:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page should give you the information you need:
Wikipedia:Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism Vrenator (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will try to check out that link tonight. Strange, though, this user has several warning already on his/her page. Again, I appreciate the quick link. CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 22:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, what to do about a user posting the same thing on 3 different article pages? The previous user is making the same post on the Geneation X, Generation Y, and now the Strauss & Howe TALK pages. I thought there was some rule against doing that? Since, this same user was engaging in reverting edits, he then went on to vandalize the page and use foul language. What is the proper channel now? Report vandal? Edit warring? CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 01:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If the user vandalizes on the same page or different pages then warnings should be given. If there is a difference of opinion rather than vandalism it should be discussed on the article's talk page. I'm not an administrator but you may wish to discuss it with an administrator. Just look up the Help pages on Edit warring and vandalism and report it if necessary. Vrenator (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks again, Vrenator, for watching my user page. That appears to be an IP user who just registered and their first edit was on my user page. I imagine they were a blocked IP address, and I had something to do with the block. It is a battle out there! Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive?

How am I acting disruptivly? It is my view that there is a total misuse of power going on here! A view that can't be removed from me,I've made no biased edits, engaged in discussion, and provided a fifth reference to the existing four in regards to Derry Airports irish name.--NorthernCounties (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm... make up your mind. In, or out? :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Vrenator for the removal, I had written the above before I realised you had reverted, Cheers--NorthernCounties (talk) 19:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dum Spiro Spero

Some one else allocated the IP address I get when forget to log onPetebutt (talk) 13:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Author blanking

Please use G7 for articles in which the author blanks, especially if there is a {{db}} template. Thanks, Tommy! 18:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forged signature

Hi. I am not sure if this is something you care about, but I thought I ought to let you know that an anonymous IP forged your signature on a warning template posted on the talk page of another anonymous user who hadn't actually done anything wrong: diff. I have removed the inappropriate warning and made it clear in the edit summary that it wasn't anything to do with you: hist. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - it's a good job the history tells the true story! Vrenator (talk) 08:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The joy of anti-vandalism tools

You're having the same fun with Igloo that HJ Mitchell had, I see. For what it's worth, there's an outstanding request at User talk:Ale jrb/Scripts/igloo#suggestion 2 covering this. Uncle G (talk) 15:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paris

I was actually correcting the article about Paris, see : [1]. DITWIN GRIM (talk) 09:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]