Talk:Get Rollin'

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved.

Discussions:

No consensus, 14 September 2022, to Get Rollin', see discussion.

Other discussions:

RM, Get Rollin' (album) → Get Rollin', No consensus, 14 September 2022, discussion
RM, Get Rollin' (album) → Get Rollin', Moved, 12 December 2022, discussion

Album Genre[edit]

The album genres are listed but is there a source to support this? 2600:1700:EA02:B900:DD01:6996:DA79:D72 (talk) 20:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

https://blabbermouth.net/news/chad-kroeger-says-one-song-on-nickelbacks-new-album-is-15-years-old Sergecross73 msg me 21:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 September 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. No prejudice against renomination once the album's long-term significance becomes clearer. (Re Rotideypoc's question: I read the other RM as deciding only that the film wasn't primary, so I don't see the lack of consensus here as being at odds with that discussion.) (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:09, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Get Rollin' (album) → Get Rollin' – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. -- Jax 0677 (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ‡ Night Watch ω (talk) 22:43, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nom. Dabpage not needed, per WP:ONEOTHER. 162 etc. (talk) 01:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as no case has been made for this primarytopic grab. Dicklyon (talk) 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Get Rollin' (Nickelback album) has 214 views (and the Get Rollin' (album) redirect has 663) compared with only 103 for the film". -- Jax 0677 (talk) 09:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Right now it's hard to tell. Eventually, I'm almost certain a mainstream rock album will be the primary topic over a roller skating documentary from the 1980s. But for an unreleased album announced a week ago. That's less clear. Sergecross73 msg me 22:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to closer: Talk:Get Rollin' (film)#Requested move 7 September 2022 may imply that consensus is that no primary topic exists. This close should say if that has changed to avoid ambiguity in interpreting consensus, just to be safe. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As there is a film with the same name, I think it's necessary to distinguish between the two of them. It's fine as is.TJD2 (talk) 04:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. No primary topic. — Amakuru (talk) 15:13, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on October 5, 2022[edit]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Add Those Days to the singles template, as noted by Loudwire and Blabbermouth. https://loudwire.com/nickelback-those-days-song-lyrics/ https://blabbermouth.net/news/nickelback-shares-another-new-song-those-days 174.251.137.236 (talk) 20:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done PK650 (talk) 03:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move for "Get Rollin'"[edit]

There is a Requested move for "Get Rollin'" at Talk:Get_Rollin'#Requested_move_25_November_2022. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 December 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

result:
Moved per consensus seen below. Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^put'r there 01:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move logs: source title · target title

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

– Also proposed is to delete Get Rollin' (disambiguation) as unneeded. – This is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC based on pageviews. [1], [2], [3]. WP:ONEOTHER. Shwcz (talk) 15:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Album is more notable than old film. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This was just discussed (again)[4]. The closer proposed nominating Get Rollin' (film) for deletion; maybe try that. 162 etc. (talk) 17:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I feel that it is irrelevant whether this was just discussed. The reason that no consensus arose, was not because we don't want to move the album page, but because we did not want to move the disambiguation page. The point is, that the album gets over 200 times more hits than the film. I will consider nominating the film for deletion when I am on a computer. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:00, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support—I think the main difference between September and December is that the album went from upcoming to released. Some case can be made for a mass market album having more "significance" than a documentary film without many accolades. I'm a bit hesitant to paint with a broad brush, though, as I'm familiar with neither of these items and the significance of the documentary in relating the overall history of roller disco isn't clear. Thus - weak support. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: See Talk:Get Rollin'#Requested move 25 November 2022. Shwcz (talk) 19:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Remove user review score for Sputnikmusic 41.10.2.148 (talk) 12:39, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. Liu1126 (talk) 17:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus needed, just remove the user rating from Sputnikmusik as only staff reviews should be added and not some random user reviews 105.246.82.65 (talk) 12:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 November 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

The beginning paragraph’s phrasing makes it seem as though the deluxe edition of the album has yet to have been released. 76.127.233.235 (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ayakanaa ( t · c ) 17:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remove user rating as this is not a staff rating...[edit]

Remove the user rating score for Sputnikmusic as only staff ratings are valid 41.10.133.45 (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]